Same as in __reg64_deduce_bounds(), refine s32/u32 ranges
in __reg32_deduce_bounds() in the following situations:
- s32 range crosses U32_MAX/0 boundary, positive part of the s32 range
overlaps with u32 range:
0 U32_MAX
| [xxxxxxxxxxxxxx u32 range xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] |
|----------------------------|----------------------------|
|xxxxx s32 range xxxxxxxxx] [xxxxxxx|
0 S32_MAX S32_MIN -1
- s32 range crosses U32_MAX/0 boundary, negative part of the s32 range
overlaps with u32 range:
0 U32_MAX
| [xxxxxxxxxxxxxx u32 range xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] |
|----------------------------|----------------------------|
|xxxxxxxxx] [xxxxxxxxxxxx s32 range |
0 S32_MAX S32_MIN -1
- No refinement if ranges overlap in two intervals.
This helps for e.g. consider the following program:
call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];
w0 &= 0xffffffff;
if w0 < 0x3 goto 1f; // on fall-through u32 range [3..U32_MAX]
if w0 s> 0x1 goto 1f; // on fall-through s32 range [S32_MIN..1]
if w0 s< 0x0 goto 1f; // range can be narrowed to [S32_MIN..-1]
r10 = 0;
1: ...;
The reg_bounds.c selftest is updated to incorporate identical logic,
refinement based on non-overflowing range halves:
((x ∩ [0, smax]) ∩ (y ∩ [0, smax])) ∪
((x ∩ [smin,-1]) ∩ (y ∩ [smin,-1]))
Reported-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aakqucg4vcujVwif@gpd4/T/
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260306-bpf-32-bit-range-overflow-v3-1-f7f67e060a6b@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
fbc7aef517