Daniel Latypov 97d453bc40 kunit: rename base KUNIT_ASSERTION macro to _KUNIT_FAILED ... Context: Currently this macro's name, KUNIT_ASSERTION conflicts with the name of an enum whose values are {KUNIT_EXPECTATION, KUNIT_ASSERTION}. It's hard to think of a better name for the enum, so rename this macro. It's also a bit strange that the macro might do nothing depending on the boolean argument `pass`. Why not have callers check themselves? This patch: Moves the pass/fail checking into the callers of KUNIT_ASSERTION, so now we only call it when the check has failed. Then we rename the macro the _KUNIT_FAILED() to reflect the new semantics. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>		2022-10-07 10:16:45 -06:00
..
assert.h	kunit: remove format func from struct kunit_assert, get it to 0 bytes	2022-10-07 10:16:38 -06:00
resource.h	kunit: make kunit_kfree() only work on pointers from kunit_malloc() and friends	2022-10-07 10:15:44 -06:00
test-bug.h	kunit: fix -Wunused-function warning for __kunit_fail_current_test	2021-04-06 15:22:39 -06:00
test.h	kunit: rename base KUNIT_ASSERTION macro to _KUNIT_FAILED	2022-10-07 10:16:45 -06:00
try-catch.h	kunit: hide unexported try-catch interface in try-catch-impl.h	2020-01-09 16:42:09 -07:00