rust: drm/gem: Remove Object.dev

I noticed by chance that there's actually already a pointer to this in
struct drm_gem_object. So, no use in carrying this around!

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251021172220.252558-1-lyude@redhat.com
This commit is contained in:
Lyude Paul 2025-10-21 13:21:36 -04:00
parent 5ae65bdcb8
commit d3917368eb

View file

@ -167,12 +167,10 @@ impl<T: IntoGEMObject> BaseObject for T {}
/// Invariants
///
/// - `self.obj` is a valid instance of a `struct drm_gem_object`.
/// - `self.dev` is always a valid pointer to a `struct drm_device`.
#[repr(C)]
#[pin_data]
pub struct Object<T: DriverObject + Send + Sync> {
obj: Opaque<bindings::drm_gem_object>,
dev: NonNull<drm::Device<T::Driver>>,
#[pin]
data: T,
}
@ -202,9 +200,6 @@ impl<T: DriverObject> Object<T> {
try_pin_init!(Self {
obj: Opaque::new(bindings::drm_gem_object::default()),
data <- T::new(dev, size),
// INVARIANT: The drm subsystem guarantees that the `struct drm_device` will live
// as long as the GEM object lives.
dev: dev.into(),
}),
GFP_KERNEL,
)?;
@ -227,9 +222,13 @@ impl<T: DriverObject> Object<T> {
/// Returns the `Device` that owns this GEM object.
pub fn dev(&self) -> &drm::Device<T::Driver> {
// SAFETY: The DRM subsystem guarantees that the `struct drm_device` will live as long as
// the GEM object lives, hence the pointer must be valid.
unsafe { self.dev.as_ref() }
// SAFETY:
// - `struct drm_gem_object.dev` is initialized and valid for as long as the GEM
// object lives.
// - The device we used for creating the gem object is passed as &drm::Device<T::Driver> to
// Object::<T>::new(), so we know that `T::Driver` is the right generic parameter to use
// here.
unsafe { drm::Device::from_raw((*self.as_raw()).dev) }
}
fn as_raw(&self) -> *mut bindings::drm_gem_object {