ipmi:si: Fix check for a misbehaving BMC

There is a race on checking the state in the sender, it needs to be
checked under a lock.  But you also need a check to avoid issues with
a misbehaving BMC for run to completion mode.  So leave the check at
the beginning for run to completion, and add a check under the lock
to avoid the race.

Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Fixes: bc3a9d2177 ("ipmi:si: Gracefully handle if the BMC is non-functional")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <corey@minyard.net>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) <rafael@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Corey Minyard 2026-02-13 00:15:04 -06:00
parent 62cd145453
commit cae66f1a1d

View file

@ -924,9 +924,14 @@ static int sender(void *send_info, struct ipmi_smi_msg *msg)
{
struct smi_info *smi_info = send_info;
unsigned long flags;
int rv = IPMI_CC_NO_ERROR;
debug_timestamp(smi_info, "Enqueue");
/*
* Check here for run to completion mode. A check under lock is
* later.
*/
if (smi_info->si_state == SI_HOSED)
return IPMI_BUS_ERR;
@ -940,18 +945,15 @@ static int sender(void *send_info, struct ipmi_smi_msg *msg)
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&smi_info->si_lock, flags);
/*
* The following two lines don't need to be under the lock for
* the lock's sake, but they do need SMP memory barriers to
* avoid getting things out of order. We are already claiming
* the lock, anyway, so just do it under the lock to avoid the
* ordering problem.
*/
BUG_ON(smi_info->waiting_msg);
smi_info->waiting_msg = msg;
check_start_timer_thread(smi_info);
if (smi_info->si_state == SI_HOSED) {
rv = IPMI_BUS_ERR;
} else {
BUG_ON(smi_info->waiting_msg);
smi_info->waiting_msg = msg;
check_start_timer_thread(smi_info);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smi_info->si_lock, flags);
return IPMI_CC_NO_ERROR;
return rv;
}
static void set_run_to_completion(void *send_info, bool i_run_to_completion)