ASoC: codecs: max9768: use snd_kcontrol_chip() instead of snd_soc_kcontrol_component()

We have very similar name functions (A)(B). Both gets component from
snd_kcontrol, but (A) is used in callback functions which is registered
through snd_soc_add_component_controls(), (B) is used through
snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets().

	(A) snd_soc_kcontrol_component()
	(B) snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component()

(B) is using very picky way to get component but using it is necessary in
ASoC. But (A) is just wrapper function to snd_kcontrol_chip(), and directly
using it without wrapper is very common way on ALSA.
To reduce confusions of similar function, let's use common way on (A).

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/871pn6ru2q.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kuninori Morimoto 2025-10-14 04:22:21 +00:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent ee4ac04e3c
commit 0c933edebd
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 24D68B725D5487D0

View file

@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static const struct reg_default max9768_default_regs[] = {
static int max9768_get_gpio(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *c = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *c = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct max9768 *max9768 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(c);
int val = gpiod_get_value_cansleep(max9768->mute);
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static int max9768_get_gpio(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
static int max9768_set_gpio(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *c = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *c = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct max9768 *max9768 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(c);
bool val = !ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
int ret;